<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Mistakes Authors Make</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2012/10/19/top-10-mistakes-authors-make/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2012/10/19/top-10-mistakes-authors-make/</link>
	<description>Official blog of the AMA Manual of Style</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Schuber, PhD, MS, ELS</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2012/10/19/top-10-mistakes-authors-make/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Schuber, PhD, MS, ELS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=493#comment-1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the serious but not heavy-handed list. I plan to share it with colleagues who think they are developing a manual of house style — I&#039;ve been known to drop AMA heavily on meeting-room tables to make a point about the work involved. One observation about Mistake Number 1: Experience teaches that most journals don&#039;t follow their own Instructions for Authors (eg, they claim to follow AMA reference style but insist on tweaks). I&#039;m afraid that the narcissism of small differences is alive and thriving in editorial offices. But thanks again for the post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the serious but not heavy-handed list. I plan to share it with colleagues who think they are developing a manual of house style — I&#8217;ve been known to drop AMA heavily on meeting-room tables to make a point about the work involved. One observation about Mistake Number 1: Experience teaches that most journals don&#8217;t follow their own Instructions for Authors (eg, they claim to follow AMA reference style but insist on tweaks). I&#8217;m afraid that the narcissism of small differences is alive and thriving in editorial offices. But thanks again for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
