<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abbreviation Nation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/07/27/abbreviation-nation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/07/27/abbreviation-nation/</link>
	<description>Official blog of the AMA Manual of Style</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbreviation Nation (via amastyleinsider) &#171; rite2communicate</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/07/27/abbreviation-nation/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbreviation Nation (via amastyleinsider) &#171; rite2communicate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=254#comment-94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Very true. We certainly all embrace alphabet soup. While I agree that texting is a valid and efficient method of communicating, it will create more and more challenges for the future of the writing and editing fields.   Of the reference books I use while editing the Archives journals, my favorite by far is MEDical ABBREViations: 28,000 Conveniences at the Expense of Communication and Safety, 13th Edition, by Neil M. Davis. Not only does it have the most wonderfully snarky title I’ve ever seen on a reference book, but it is the Great Decoder, the book that allows me to make sense of the myriad abbreviations I run across in my daily work. As much as we are a natio &#8230; Read More [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Very true. We certainly all embrace alphabet soup. While I agree that texting is a valid and efficient method of communicating, it will create more and more challenges for the future of the writing and editing fields.   Of the reference books I use while editing the Archives journals, my favorite by far is MEDical ABBREViations: 28,000 Conveniences at the Expense of Communication and Safety, 13th Edition, by Neil M. Davis. Not only does it have the most wonderfully snarky title I’ve ever seen on a reference book, but it is the Great Decoder, the book that allows me to make sense of the myriad abbreviations I run across in my daily work. As much as we are a natio &#8230; Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne S. Barnhill</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/07/27/abbreviation-nation/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne S. Barnhill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=254#comment-78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While &quot;Mac&quot; and &quot;PC&quot; are undeniably abbreviations, I&#039;m not sure that expanding them would be helpful. Would anyone who doesn&#039;t know what a Mac is know what a Macintosh is? And &quot;personal computer&quot; is a very broad and general term that could certainly include Macs, whereas &quot;PC&quot; has come to mean (as I understand it), any system running some version of a Microsoft Windows operating system--or, even more generally--&quot;not a Mac.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While &#8220;Mac&#8221; and &#8220;PC&#8221; are undeniably abbreviations, I&#8217;m not sure that expanding them would be helpful. Would anyone who doesn&#8217;t know what a Mac is know what a Macintosh is? And &#8220;personal computer&#8221; is a very broad and general term that could certainly include Macs, whereas &#8220;PC&#8221; has come to mean (as I understand it), any system running some version of a Microsoft Windows operating system&#8211;or, even more generally&#8211;&#8221;not a Mac.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katharine O'Moore-Klopf</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/07/27/abbreviation-nation/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katharine O'Moore-Klopf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=254#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news! There is a newer edition of the great reference book that you mentioned: MEDical ABBREViations: 32,000 Conveniences at the Expense of Communication and Safety, 15th edition; http://www.amazon.com/Medi​cal-Abbreviations-Convenie​nces-Expense-Communication​/dp/0931431158/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news! There is a newer edition of the great reference book that you mentioned: MEDical ABBREViations: 32,000 Conveniences at the Expense of Communication and Safety, 15th edition; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Medi​cal-Abbreviations-Convenie​nces-Expense-Communication​/dp/0931431158/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Medi​cal-Abbreviations-Convenie​nces-Expense-Communication​/dp/0931431158/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ann Branagan</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/07/27/abbreviation-nation/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Ann Branagan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=254#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for providing another value resource for my reference shelf!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for providing another value resource for my reference shelf!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
