<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions From Users of the Manual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/05/20/questions-from-users-of-the-manual-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/05/20/questions-from-users-of-the-manual-2/</link>
	<description>Official blog of the AMA Manual of Style</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amastyleinsider</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/05/20/questions-from-users-of-the-manual-2/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amastyleinsider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=193#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &lt;em&gt;AMA Manual&lt;/em&gt; does not directly address the question of bracketing (or not bracketing) ellipses used in a quotation; however, in the section on ellipses (8.8), which contains a number of examples of omissions within a quotation, no brackets are used.  So, our policy would generally be &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; to bracket ellipses added to quotations to indicate an omission.

However, if an author has used ellipses in his or her own writing, bracketing the ellipses introduced by the person quoting from this author, and omitting part of the quotation, would be important so that the reader would know that these were not the author’s ellipses but rather those of  the writer quoting the author.  The &lt;em&gt;Chicago Manual&lt;/em&gt;, in section 13.56 on bracketed ellipses, describes this particular situation and provides advice on how to address it.  In consulting &lt;em&gt;Chicago&lt;/em&gt; on this point, I also learned about a punctuation mark unfamiliar to me:  suspension points.  A French cousin to ellipses.   Read more about that in &lt;em&gt;Chicago&lt;/em&gt;, section 13.35.    

---Cheryl Iverson]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>AMA Manual</em> does not directly address the question of bracketing (or not bracketing) ellipses used in a quotation; however, in the section on ellipses (8.8), which contains a number of examples of omissions within a quotation, no brackets are used.  So, our policy would generally be <em>not</em> to bracket ellipses added to quotations to indicate an omission.</p>
<p>However, if an author has used ellipses in his or her own writing, bracketing the ellipses introduced by the person quoting from this author, and omitting part of the quotation, would be important so that the reader would know that these were not the author’s ellipses but rather those of  the writer quoting the author.  The <em>Chicago Manual</em>, in section 13.56 on bracketed ellipses, describes this particular situation and provides advice on how to address it.  In consulting <em>Chicago</em> on this point, I also learned about a punctuation mark unfamiliar to me:  suspension points.  A French cousin to ellipses.   Read more about that in <em>Chicago</em>, section 13.35.    </p>
<p>&#8212;Cheryl Iverson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/05/20/questions-from-users-of-the-manual-2/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 14:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=193#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about ellipses added to a quote? The Chicago Manual of Style says not to add brackets around the added ellipses, the APA says add brackets...and the AMA says nothing, or ??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about ellipses added to a quote? The Chicago Manual of Style says not to add brackets around the added ellipses, the APA says add brackets&#8230;and the AMA says nothing, or ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amastyleinsider</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/05/20/questions-from-users-of-the-manual-2/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amastyleinsider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 15:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=193#comment-28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, you&#039;re right that the sidebar and some other pages have &quot;email.&quot; I think that was a Wordpress out-of-the-box thing that we just overlooked! I will see if it can be changed in the template. AMA style for &quot;e-mail&quot; definitely uses the hyphen, although my personal opinion is that the word will become &quot;dehyphenized&quot; in the very near future. 

---Brenda Gregoline]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, you&#8217;re right that the sidebar and some other pages have &#8220;email.&#8221; I think that was a WordPress out-of-the-box thing that we just overlooked! I will see if it can be changed in the template. AMA style for &#8220;e-mail&#8221; definitely uses the hyphen, although my personal opinion is that the word will become &#8220;dehyphenized&#8221; in the very near future. </p>
<p>&#8212;Brenda Gregoline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/2011/05/20/questions-from-users-of-the-manual-2/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 20:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amamanualofstyle.com/?p=193#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there,

The reply suggests that the AMA style is to hyphenate the abbreviation of electronic mail as &#039;e-mail&#039;, yet in several places on the web page, including this submission form, it appears as &#039;email.&#039; Is the style of the AMA website intentionally different from the manual? Or am I misreading the reply? I tend to not use a hyphen in email, for purposes of brevity, but I&#039;m interested in what is considered correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>The reply suggests that the AMA style is to hyphenate the abbreviation of electronic mail as &#8216;e-mail&#8217;, yet in several places on the web page, including this submission form, it appears as &#8216;email.&#8217; Is the style of the AMA website intentionally different from the manual? Or am I misreading the reply? I tend to not use a hyphen in email, for purposes of brevity, but I&#8217;m interested in what is considered correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
